So much depends on the players to be named later

Now comes news of Dr. Orly Taitz's latest legal maneuvers, courtesy of a blog post from ifthethunderdontgetya, if that is indeed his real blog.  The doctor-lawyer, as all good taitzologists are aware, is fighting a fine imposed by a federal judge in Georgia.  She asked Justice Thomas for a stay; he said no.  She then went to Justice Alito with the same request, and he sent it to the whole court en banc to get the damn thing over with.  As thunder points out, she also requested of the Supreme Court revision of Thomas' signature on the denial, as she has reason to believe it had been forged.  But that is not all, no, that is not all.  Taitz requested permission to review the signatures of all nine Justices, for she has determined that Something is up at the Supreme Court.  Let us now turn to her submission to the Court:

Currently, there is a clear pattern of entries being made on the docket of the Supreme Court, or entries or even cases deleted, when the court is closed and the Justices and the clerks are not there.

Scandal!

Supreme Court is not a city bus, when one can go in and out any times he feels like.

And yet the truth of Obama's origin has been thrown under it.

What she wants to make things right:

1.  Taitz is requesting an appointment to visit the Supreme Court with a forensic document expert (to be identified at a later date) and view the orders pertaining to her cases and verify and clarify, that there is a valid signature of Justice Thomas and his clerk on the denial of application [blah blah blah].

Ah, the document expert to be named later.  Has the Major League Birther trade deadline passed yet?

2.  Taitz is requesting an appointment to visit the Supreme Court with a forensic document expert and verify that there genuine signatures of all nine Justices on the denial of her case [from last year].

The same player to be named later, I assume.  So far, a reasonable request.

3.  Taitz is requesting your Honor to grant her and her computer security expert (to be identified at a later date) access to the electronic docket of the cases pertaining to her and her clients, in order to ascertain who made an entry in the docket 10A56 on Saturday, July 17, 2010 and who deleted the Application 08A 524 from the docket of the Supreme Court and whether such person was authorized to make such changes to the docket.

Forensic document expert and computer security expert, both to be named later.  All one guy, no doubt.  My money is on that guy Pamela Geller featured who claimed to prove Obama's Hawaiian birth certificate was a forgery.  What was his name?

In addition to filing this request with the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Taitz submitted copies of it to the acting Solicitor General of the United States, the U.S. Attorney's office in Georgia, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, the Department of Justice's Public Integrity Section, the UN High Commission for Human Rights, the UN Commission for Civil Rights Defenders, and three offices of the International Criminal Court.  I am not making this up.

This just in: The Supreme Court has denied Taitz's request for a stay of the fine, but no word so far on the above request for access and verification.  Good news for truth and for John McCain!